Anglo merchant elites and jews are natural allies, simple as.
Just because some disagree on praxis does not make one or another of them friends who we can tolerate in positions of power. Don't keep committing Churchills out of excessive pride and willful treachery to continentals. That, or see clearly, as we do with the US, the conflicted nature of Britain, in being inclined to be enemies of Europe, as they were in the World Wars, and potentially before, like a child who'd sooner commit fratricide than be a good second son.
I agree, though it can be said the British ought to have aspired to produce an elite capable of displacing and gatekeeping those rotten elements. Anglos seem to have a particularly bad habit of ingratiating elites and forming allegiances with those who inevitably betray them or sell them out. I think it'd be best to deffer much of that sort of decision making to northern continentals and those with more Saxon blood. Hitler's peace deal with Briton was a gift from God in this regard, rejected in favor of a pact with the devil's sons.
Those British elites who fomented brother wars among continentals naturally began to see their own people as just another set of groups to set against one another, and found common ground with a foreign tribe who practice much of the same strategies. Disgusting, the whole lot of them.
Yes, utter traitors. One aim with this series is to lay out the history of their collaboration. I agree with your characterisation. I've heard, I think from leftists, the notion that we common folk live as imperial subjects too in the 'internal empire'. Our rulers have as much contempt for us as for any distant colonial subjects and perhaps more.
Brilliantly well wrote article, fascinating details.
Liked and shared.
Wow! So many fascinating facts! Great work, mate!
Amazing
Anglo merchant elites and jews are natural allies, simple as.
Just because some disagree on praxis does not make one or another of them friends who we can tolerate in positions of power. Don't keep committing Churchills out of excessive pride and willful treachery to continentals. That, or see clearly, as we do with the US, the conflicted nature of Britain, in being inclined to be enemies of Europe, as they were in the World Wars, and potentially before, like a child who'd sooner commit fratricide than be a good second son.
If by Britain you mean Churchill, Lloyd George and co, yes. Most ordinary Brits had no beef with the continent.
I agree, though it can be said the British ought to have aspired to produce an elite capable of displacing and gatekeeping those rotten elements. Anglos seem to have a particularly bad habit of ingratiating elites and forming allegiances with those who inevitably betray them or sell them out. I think it'd be best to deffer much of that sort of decision making to northern continentals and those with more Saxon blood. Hitler's peace deal with Briton was a gift from God in this regard, rejected in favor of a pact with the devil's sons.
Those British elites who fomented brother wars among continentals naturally began to see their own people as just another set of groups to set against one another, and found common ground with a foreign tribe who practice much of the same strategies. Disgusting, the whole lot of them.
Yes, utter traitors. One aim with this series is to lay out the history of their collaboration. I agree with your characterisation. I've heard, I think from leftists, the notion that we common folk live as imperial subjects too in the 'internal empire'. Our rulers have as much contempt for us as for any distant colonial subjects and perhaps more.
Godspeed.