Loved your deep dive into the 1999 Stephen Lawrence report with Woes and Morgoth!
Funnily enough, Paul Dacre is gloating today at winning the Prince Harry court case and mentions how proud he was of that front page you mentioned!
So we're still referencing the crime all these years later.
(it's embedded in the article - 'An overwhelming vindication of our journalism': Associated Newspapers editor-in-chief Paul Dacre hails Daily Mail victory over Prince Harry in phone-hacking case)
Dacre epitomises the utterly useless, fake, concede-everything conservative who stops us having any kind of genuine opposition to the left. After he finished at the Mail I think the next editor was Geordie Grieg, who’s the same. The Times always has a leftist in charge. The Sun had David Yelland at the time of Macpherson. The Telegraph posts leftist nonsense every day. They all want us to be angrily impotent. And they all work with HNH and Red Flare.
I watched the podcast and, at over two hors long it is quite long, but it was so interesting that the time seem to fly. The reaction of Duane Brooks to the arrival of the police was very telling. His friend has been stabbed and instead of pleading for help he is extremely aggressive, what you did not mention is that he called them, "f**king pigs, and asked them why are you here(well Duane, a serious crime has taken place, we have to investigate).
You spoke about the Henry Nowak case, and made the comparison, but a murder took place in London one year after the Lawrence murder. Richard Everitt a young white boy was stabbed to death after being surrounded by a bang of Bangladeshis, some of the accused were whisked away to Bangladesh, the local MP, Frank Dobson(Labour), played down any suggestion of race, claiming that it could damage community cohesion, and what is very telling, Michael Mansfield, Imran Khan and other left wing agitators defended the accused.
I didn’t know that last bit about Khan and Mansfield. No surprise I suppose. They’re anti-white activists dressed as lawyers. About Brooks’ behaviour at the scene, yes, we barely mentioned how peculiar and suspicious it was. Strangely, the inquiry’s treatment of Brooks suggests to me that they were self-consciously tip-toeing around him as much as possible, as though they knew what they’d find if they took a proper look.
You mentioned the fact that Doreen Lawrence said some dumb things. One of the claims she made was that the police who arrived on the scene did not provide first aid, because they did not want to get their hands dirty on a black man. She had absolutely no evidence for this ridiculous claim, but she didn't need any, when it comes claims of racism, no evidence is required. In 2019, she was at it again. In the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire, Lawrence claimed that the response of the London Fire Brigade was racist. She claimed that if the building had been full of white people, the firefighters would have cleared the building a lot faster. It was a wicked thing to say, a disgusting slur on men who had thrown themselves into a raging inferno. After a backlash, Lawrence doubled down on her remarks, but this time she had picked on the wrong organisation, the fire brigade were not going to take the knee like the police. Her advisors must have told her that this is a fight you are not going to win, and she made a grovelling apology.
Yes. She seems to have been convinced that white racism permeates everything. I think that was the effect of being surrounded by anti-white activists amid bereavement and shock. She doesn't seem to have been that way before. Since the murder though, she's blessed us all with a long series of absurd, outrageous insults and accusations, and she's earned lots of honorary doctorates.
Doreen Lawrence was on the BBC again this morning. She was speaking about appearing as a witness against The Daily Mail re the hacking allegations. The irony of her attacking the Mail is overwhelming, considering how that newspaper behaved during the investigation into the suspects of Lawrences murder, and on top of that, she was quite happy for hidden cameras and microphones to record the suspects when it suited her.
I read an article on the Civitas website, Racist Murders and Pressure Group Politics, which demolishes the McPherson Report. It is a very long article even when you skip the bios of the three authors, but it is well worth the read, as it forensically takes the report apart bit by bit. One part that i found odd at the time, is when it reveals that the Chair for the Commission for Racial Equality had contacted the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to tell him that the murder was to be treated as racially motivated. This was immediately passed down through the chain of command, and it seemed odd that after hearing of the murder, that with no details, he should contact the head police officer in the country, and issue such a demand. It was only after hearing you explain how the chair had been contacted by a police officer himself that it made sense.
Yes, the police at Plumstead happen to have already had separate processes for 'racist incidents' and one or more of the middle-ranking officers were already in contact with the head of the CRE, who was presumably the one who told the other 'anti-racist' organisations who then surrounded the Lawrences. Or they heard about it some other way. But yes, several of the police were already basically part of 'race relations'.
Dwane Brooks was a rapist and his gang including St Lawrence were muggers. They ventured into in area they were warned to keep away from but they went looking for a fight and lost. Brooks and gang then lied to police and said they were attacked by baseball bats, clearly Brooks et al, mentioned bats to the police because the knives used were brought to the fight by them.
The attending Ambulance workers failed, because if the misdirection, to conduct a whole body examination of Lawrence.
Lawrence wasn't an innocent, he was a known mugger and had only avoided conviction because he hadn't been Identified by victims.
The fake story was not dissimilar to the St Floyd debacle in the US.
That same week as the Lawrence incident a white kid, of good character, was set upon by a gang of blacks rob him, they killed him. Not a word from the scum media.
Too long ago now, it was West London. The kid was in a coma for a month or so. I also remember a murder involving an African Killed his wife and kids. Again not a peep in the MSM press. A discreet entry on the local rag, that was it. The Robbery statistics were another source of information that was stifled. 98% all involved afro-carribean men. The Met police report was pulled. The part that was most disturbing was that 80% of the victims were white and female.
I no longer have access to the sources I once had. But not much has changed.
About robbery - I think the spread of 'anti-racism' among the police owed something to the earlier controversies (created entirely by activists) over mugging and the police's use of sus powers. Because treating mugging (armed robbery) as a crime meant masses of blacks being prosecuted, the police had to be vilified for doing their work. The race relations gang had already achieved a lot before Lawrence was killed, including spreading the notion of police racism. It was absurd, but with the media and politicians already converted, it was possible to spread and use that notion. And after all, the same politicians were the whole reason the blacks were here in the first place.
It was yet another move of the Fabian imposition of the tool of multiculturalism to destroy the UK. The subsequent McPherson report was a sham. It was a total surrender to critical theory ideology to subvert policing and being it into law.
Loved your deep dive into the 1999 Stephen Lawrence report with Woes and Morgoth!
Funnily enough, Paul Dacre is gloating today at winning the Prince Harry court case and mentions how proud he was of that front page you mentioned!
So we're still referencing the crime all these years later.
(it's embedded in the article - 'An overwhelming vindication of our journalism': Associated Newspapers editor-in-chief Paul Dacre hails Daily Mail victory over Prince Harry in phone-hacking case)
Dacre epitomises the utterly useless, fake, concede-everything conservative who stops us having any kind of genuine opposition to the left. After he finished at the Mail I think the next editor was Geordie Grieg, who’s the same. The Times always has a leftist in charge. The Sun had David Yelland at the time of Macpherson. The Telegraph posts leftist nonsense every day. They all want us to be angrily impotent. And they all work with HNH and Red Flare.
I watched the podcast and, at over two hors long it is quite long, but it was so interesting that the time seem to fly. The reaction of Duane Brooks to the arrival of the police was very telling. His friend has been stabbed and instead of pleading for help he is extremely aggressive, what you did not mention is that he called them, "f**king pigs, and asked them why are you here(well Duane, a serious crime has taken place, we have to investigate).
You spoke about the Henry Nowak case, and made the comparison, but a murder took place in London one year after the Lawrence murder. Richard Everitt a young white boy was stabbed to death after being surrounded by a bang of Bangladeshis, some of the accused were whisked away to Bangladesh, the local MP, Frank Dobson(Labour), played down any suggestion of race, claiming that it could damage community cohesion, and what is very telling, Michael Mansfield, Imran Khan and other left wing agitators defended the accused.
I didn’t know that last bit about Khan and Mansfield. No surprise I suppose. They’re anti-white activists dressed as lawyers. About Brooks’ behaviour at the scene, yes, we barely mentioned how peculiar and suspicious it was. Strangely, the inquiry’s treatment of Brooks suggests to me that they were self-consciously tip-toeing around him as much as possible, as though they knew what they’d find if they took a proper look.
Thanks for your reply.
You mentioned the fact that Doreen Lawrence said some dumb things. One of the claims she made was that the police who arrived on the scene did not provide first aid, because they did not want to get their hands dirty on a black man. She had absolutely no evidence for this ridiculous claim, but she didn't need any, when it comes claims of racism, no evidence is required. In 2019, she was at it again. In the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire, Lawrence claimed that the response of the London Fire Brigade was racist. She claimed that if the building had been full of white people, the firefighters would have cleared the building a lot faster. It was a wicked thing to say, a disgusting slur on men who had thrown themselves into a raging inferno. After a backlash, Lawrence doubled down on her remarks, but this time she had picked on the wrong organisation, the fire brigade were not going to take the knee like the police. Her advisors must have told her that this is a fight you are not going to win, and she made a grovelling apology.
Yes. She seems to have been convinced that white racism permeates everything. I think that was the effect of being surrounded by anti-white activists amid bereavement and shock. She doesn't seem to have been that way before. Since the murder though, she's blessed us all with a long series of absurd, outrageous insults and accusations, and she's earned lots of honorary doctorates.
Doreen Lawrence was on the BBC again this morning. She was speaking about appearing as a witness against The Daily Mail re the hacking allegations. The irony of her attacking the Mail is overwhelming, considering how that newspaper behaved during the investigation into the suspects of Lawrences murder, and on top of that, she was quite happy for hidden cameras and microphones to record the suspects when it suited her.
I read an article on the Civitas website, Racist Murders and Pressure Group Politics, which demolishes the McPherson Report. It is a very long article even when you skip the bios of the three authors, but it is well worth the read, as it forensically takes the report apart bit by bit. One part that i found odd at the time, is when it reveals that the Chair for the Commission for Racial Equality had contacted the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police to tell him that the murder was to be treated as racially motivated. This was immediately passed down through the chain of command, and it seemed odd that after hearing of the murder, that with no details, he should contact the head police officer in the country, and issue such a demand. It was only after hearing you explain how the chair had been contacted by a police officer himself that it made sense.
I read that Civitas article too. Interesting critique. It's like centre-left v anti-white left. I mostly agree with it.
Yes, the police at Plumstead happen to have already had separate processes for 'racist incidents' and one or more of the middle-ranking officers were already in contact with the head of the CRE, who was presumably the one who told the other 'anti-racist' organisations who then surrounded the Lawrences. Or they heard about it some other way. But yes, several of the police were already basically part of 'race relations'.
Dwane Brooks was a rapist and his gang including St Lawrence were muggers. They ventured into in area they were warned to keep away from but they went looking for a fight and lost. Brooks and gang then lied to police and said they were attacked by baseball bats, clearly Brooks et al, mentioned bats to the police because the knives used were brought to the fight by them.
The attending Ambulance workers failed, because if the misdirection, to conduct a whole body examination of Lawrence.
Lawrence wasn't an innocent, he was a known mugger and had only avoided conviction because he hadn't been Identified by victims.
The fake story was not dissimilar to the St Floyd debacle in the US.
That same week as the Lawrence incident a white kid, of good character, was set upon by a gang of blacks rob him, they killed him. Not a word from the scum media.
Do you know the name of the white kid?
Too long ago now, it was West London. The kid was in a coma for a month or so. I also remember a murder involving an African Killed his wife and kids. Again not a peep in the MSM press. A discreet entry on the local rag, that was it. The Robbery statistics were another source of information that was stifled. 98% all involved afro-carribean men. The Met police report was pulled. The part that was most disturbing was that 80% of the victims were white and female.
I no longer have access to the sources I once had. But not much has changed.
About robbery - I think the spread of 'anti-racism' among the police owed something to the earlier controversies (created entirely by activists) over mugging and the police's use of sus powers. Because treating mugging (armed robbery) as a crime meant masses of blacks being prosecuted, the police had to be vilified for doing their work. The race relations gang had already achieved a lot before Lawrence was killed, including spreading the notion of police racism. It was absurd, but with the media and politicians already converted, it was possible to spread and use that notion. And after all, the same politicians were the whole reason the blacks were here in the first place.
It was yet another move of the Fabian imposition of the tool of multiculturalism to destroy the UK. The subsequent McPherson report was a sham. It was a total surrender to critical theory ideology to subvert policing and being it into law.